Excellent
997 reviews
RegenexxHonesty, pricing, process and quality scores appear once 5 customers have rated them.
Regenexx pioneered interventional orthopedics, using the body’s own cells and natural healing abilities to treat orthopedic conditions and injuries non-surgically. Our treatment protocols are grounded in ongoing research and continuously refined through our dedicated R&D team, specialized laboratory, and patient-reported outcomes tracking data.Regenexx has developed the most advanced processing and treatment techniques used today and has published a significant share of the worldwide research on the use of bone marrow concentrate for orthopedic conditions.Only a select group of highly-skilled musculoskeletal doctors are licensed to perform regenerative orthopedic procedures using Regenexx treatment protocols and injectates. The doctors in our licensed physician network are independent medical providers and are not employees or agents of Regenexx. They have chosen to license Regenexx technology and treatment protocols for use in their regenerative orthopedic practice.Regenexx is dedicated to advancing orthobiologic treatments, research, and technology to support patients seeking alternatives to surgery or pain medications.Regenexx maintains an active patient registry that tracks patients’ progress and side effects, post-procedure using Regenexx injectates. Our outcomes database contains records on tens of thousands of procedures performed by physicians in the licensed Regenexx network. Those outcomes are transparently published and updated monthly at https://regenexx.com/results/Like all medical procedures, regenerative procedures using Regenexx injectates have a success and failure rate. Patient reviews on this site should not be interpreted as a statement on the effectiveness of our treatments for anyone else.
Regenexx (regenexx.com) has 997 customer reviews on Rated Honest, with an average rating of 4.5 out of 5.
Showing 48 reviews with 3 stars · Clear filters
Mary P.
Posted
Thankfully, for several years my knee was almost pain free, but now it swells and is becoming painful again, thus limiting many activities. If stem cells from one's own body last this amount of time, embryonic stem cells may be a more lasting choice.
William C.
Posted
I am happy with the results from my regenexx treatment but not impressed with the follow up. Since stem cell treatment is still in the early stage, I imagine that research is critical to the company and to its use long term. I was amazed that having a mandatory MRI was not part of the process. The cost could have easily been included with the overall process. The MRI was mandated for the diagnosis and I would think research 101 would insist on an MRI to show a true comparison after 1 or 2 years. That being said, my knee is dramatically better and I am very happy I had the procedure. Relying on feel versus a visual proven picture leaves uncertainty however as to it actual and likely long term benefit. I would assume the goal is to have this treatment proven and ultimately covered by insurance so that more people could have access to this procedure.
Michael H.
Posted
my knee was almost bone on bone the stem made my knee about 80 to 85% for about a year and a half. I am now down to about 60% and will probably need a replacement
Ronald C.
Posted
A couple equipment malfuctions upset me worked about 80 regeneration but now i will get new hip aug
Cindra S.
Posted
When I first had the procedure it was amazing and got better month after month for the 1st year, after the 1st year the original symptoms and problems started to come back, two years later I'm back to square A. For the cost of the procedure it's not cost effective if you have to have it done every year. That's unfortunate, if it were more affordable or covered by insurance I would do it again. I'm giving it 3 stars as it relieved me of tremendous pain for the first year, had it continued to work afterwards I would give 5 stars.
Jerry L.
Posted
I had to treatment areas, my right knee and left hip. The stem cell/PRP injections on the knee are still holding up pretty well, but I do experience some occasional pain behind the knee. The hip treatment however was never improved, and possibly worsened by the injections. The hip injections were also very painful.
David W.
Posted
My procedure was moderately successful. I had hoped for a little better, but I think the stem cell therapy is still being modified and improved.
Suzanne W.
Posted
I believe the procedure works for meniscus and some other types of joint repair. It helps little with osteoarthritis and unfortunately this is a progressive degenerative disorder. I believe the doctor knew I had osteoarthritis manifesting in my knees. The only disclosure he gave me was that this procedure works for some people and not for others. I believe Dr. Cohen mislead me because he withheld a full disclosure regarding the osteoarthritis. The office did a full panel of x rays on my knees; osteoarthritis is rather obvious.
