Ann
Posted
ok, ok most of the time
ok most of the time
Average
175 reviews
Honesty, pricing, process and quality scores appear once 5 customers have rated them.
Appraisal software that imports MLS and Public Records data into an appraiser’s existing software, filling in the subject, comparables and 1004MC.
DataMaster for Appraisers (datamasterusa.com) has 175 customer reviews on Rated Honest, with an average rating of 3.8 out of 5.
Showing 42 reviews with 3 stars · Clear filters
Ann
Posted
ok most of the time
Thomas
Posted
The 1004MC portion is no loner needed
John
Posted
Pretty good software, but amount of time saved per report, after all the necessary tweaking once data is sent and now that 1004MC is not needed, is not that much. Customer service has been great.
Donald
Posted
Still cant get all the fields correct. Still waiting on the age to be correct for comps and actives.
Appraiser from H.
Posted
The product works and that's key. My issue is the cost, for what I pay, regression analysis should be included. There are similar programs that are cheaper that now integrate better than before. My key issue that has held me from switching is that I'm waiting to see if Data Master will offer some regression tools to this wonderful program.
RR
Posted
The product is user-friendly, however, it is expensive for a data importer.
Paul
Posted
2055 and 1025 data transfer falls short of expectations. The URAR performs fairly well.
Catherine
Posted
I've called twice about problems with the way the MLS information transfers to my ACI and both times it was not helpful. Data master does not input in some of the UAD format on the grid, such as site size includes a comma (UAD format does not allow commas) and the "Effective Date of Data Source" does not include a zero for months 01 to 09. Along with a few other items, that I have to immediately fix. It would also be nice if you included the cost approach like Spark does. To be honest, once Spark is available to ACI users I may switch over. Its not only less per month but includes the cost approach.